Feminists that walk the talk don't talk the talk
There is a barrier between feminist theory and the
people who need it the most. This is something that academia needs to realize
and amend. The strongest performers of feminism, that I know of personally, are
women that don’t identify with feminism and feminist theory even though their
lived experience says otherwise. These real-life feminist heroines that I speak
of are women who enter disputes with their late husband’s families over their
rightful inheritance that they need to raise their kids. I am talking about
women who resist forced marriages to relatives after the passing of a spouse. The
women who make ends meet against all odds and resist oppressive traditions are
feminist champions that walk the talk having never talked the talk. However, if
you speak to these women about feminism, they often misinterpret your views and
have no interest in learning about feminism even though they represent
everything that feminism is about. This means that there is a disconnect
between the theory of what feminism is and the real-world application. That
marginal error needs to be corrected if societal progress in favour of the
feminist movement is to be made. This is often a class issue that is prevalent
in academia. Many academic fields and humanities theories are exclusionary
through language, access, and gatekeeping. Access to true feminist theory that
properly explains the roots, purpose, and execution of feminism is often
reserved for humanities students and those with access to specialists; be it
through relationships, books, or digital content. Regular civilians often
encounter feminism thirdhand through subjective interpretations and as a
reaction to an injustice that has occurred. Only encountering feminism through
tears and anger is not conducive to the acceptance and adoption that needs to
be made by the masses. Gatekeepers also cripple the movement through weaponized
outrage directed at women who do not conform to mainstream feminist ideals. To
attack women for choosing to conduct their lives in a certain manner that you
deem contrary to the feminist movement is self-defeating for a movement that is
about self-determination and empowerment. The language used is often advanced
and jargon-rich thereby causing those who encounter feminist material for the
first time to be lost, finding it difficult to grasp concepts and ideas. This
phenomenon, for first-time listeners, can cause them to lose interest in
learning and appreciating feminism theory. It is easy to sit in conferences and
condemn those with internalized misogyny, due to centuries of patriarchal
indoctrination, get dopamine overloads over how much better than them we are;
meanwhile we have not done anything to advance the movement or enlighten them,
because that is the work that matters most. Preaching to the converted so you
can get a resounding amen and a ‘pat on the back’ is futile and tantamount to
mental masturbation. The people whom history will remember fondly are those who
can explain to sister Gladys that she is in fact a hero to all women and her
fight against her husband’s family is at the heart of what feminism is about.
The face of feminism needs to be someone who the target audience can identify
with, so the things that feminism is fighting for can be explained in a manner
that they can easily relate to. My mother does not know what patriarchy or
misogyny is, but she knows that if she had a daughter, she would teach her
independence because the world is a harsh place for women. It is she and her
peers that need the knowledge and platform that is hogged by academics and
think-piece specialists that have had every opportunity that the world has to
offer.
I'm glad I read this, it's an amazing piece! I love your work
ReplyDeleteThank you Ni ☺️
DeleteBro!!! "slow clap"
ReplyDeleteThank you bro 🙏🏿
DeleteI enjoyed reading this, thank you
ReplyDelete